Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2013, 12:45:42 AM
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register Forum Archive
News: How do I register to use this Forum?

Instructional DVDs and plaster casts of the Philadelphia ball & claw, Newport shell, and acanthus knee carving are now available in the SAPFM Store

Join SAPFM Today!

The Society of American Period Furniture Makers  |  Tools and Techniques  |  Finishing  |  Topic: Oil Based v. Water Based Dye « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Oil Based v. Water Based Dye  (Read 10982 times)
msiemsen
Regional Chapter Coordinator
Forum Master
***
Posts: 495

Full time woodworker, I sell tall clock movements


WWW
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2009, 07:54:57 AM »

Rich,
Would you make up a test piece and just shellac it with out the oil for a comparison? I have tried this on the same board and done a section with and without BLO. I couldn't see any difference. I am trying to find out if this application of BLO is really worthwhile or just an added extra step. If others have tried this side by side comparison and can see a difference chime in.
Logged

Mike Siemsen
Green Lake Clock Company
Rick Yochim
Forum Journeyman
**
Posts: 57


« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2009, 09:47:33 AM »

Mike,

Can do. 

My test scrap is a piece of 4/4 smoothed and highly figured stuff about 5" wide and 12" long. I'll run a very shallow saw kerf vertically down the middle to create 2 sections for the test. One side will have my final color (once I figure that out - will use the other side of the scrap for that) with BLO then garnet shellac; and the other side without the BLO... just the garnet shellac over the dye stain. Will report back what I see in the way of any differences. Of course the truest of tests would be to use untinted shellac but I'm not going to mix any of that up as Im not using it on this piece. Maybe next time. Unfortuntely I don't have a digital camera to shoot pics so I will have to post a verbal reply.

Now 'm guessing here, but I think that the darker I go on the dye stain the less pronounced will be the difference between the oiled and non-oiled treatments after the shellac's applied. That will be an assumption going in anyway.       

And Rob, did you use distilled water? It's purer (less contaminants than tap water) and what I'm using for both the wetting and the dye stain dilution. May not make much of a difference but at this point, and with all the work I've put into my piece, I figure it's worth it to make a short trip to the store to pick up a jug or two.

Cheers all,

Rick 
Logged
rococojo
Guest
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2009, 07:29:26 PM »

One thing which should be remembered here,
 A BLO finish, darkens in time? so if your sample is not new, (ie: one coat/ one coat) better remember this rule? BLO will darken in daylight, so your correct match will end up darker.
althougth its  a gradual darkening process it will end up darker.  Where as most other manufactured Finnish, bleach in sunlight.
               
                                                     Joseph hemingway
 
Logged
rchampagne
Forum Master
***
Posts: 115


« Reply #18 on: March 09, 2009, 08:34:56 PM »

Rick,
Didn't have distilled water on hand, but I used municipal water filtered through a Brita (sp?) jug. 

And to follow up on Mike's question, anybody have an opinion on "tung oil," the kind Mr. Bird uses in the article (which I understand is basically a mix of oil and varnish, or wiping varnish) v. BLO? 
Rob
Logged
George Madok
Forum Apprentice
*
Posts: 20

Started period furniture making in 1989.


WWW
« Reply #19 on: March 10, 2009, 04:51:05 PM »

I guess some experimenting is in order, I usually don't raise the grain before finishing. I figure any grain raised after applying the water based dye, followed by BLO, then shellac would be knocked down by the steel wool used to give the shellac a satin sheen? Does the presanded surface feel any smoother?

Also d keller I found your artical in the American Period Furniture journal very interesting. I bought a 100 watt metal halide area security light from home depot. It is the single ended (ie light bulb style) light that unfortunately has UV coatings on the bulb. It does darken mahogany but takes days and days of exposure to get the affect. Do the more expensive  double ended aquarium lights work faster?

Thanks,

George 
Logged
John Walkowiak
Forum Apprentice
*
Posts: 15


« Reply #20 on: March 10, 2009, 06:17:56 PM »

Hello All,
This is an interesting subject. As someone above noted, my experience with antique pieces is that while the curl is pronounced, it does not "pop" out like most people today want their curly to do. It seems that today the goal is to get  the most "pop" from the curl, but I think that can look a bit garish on a reproduction.
I have in the past experimented with applying Tung Oil and BLO before a topcoat for more depth, side by side tests.  I have tried it with shellac and oil based varnish. I have found that when the finishing is complete, there is no difference that I could see. FWW did a test about this a couple of years ago, and came to the same conclusion. Also, museums around the country have found that BLO will darken and may turn the wood black. It may take a generation, but it will happen. For that reason, why take a chance with it?

Logged
R Bohn
Forum Journeyman
**
Posts: 88


« Reply #21 on: March 10, 2009, 11:27:08 PM »

Rob-
As you can see, I don't reply to these yarns very often. Mostly do to my lack of typing skills. Your problem was brought to my attention by another member who thought my skills in this area would be some help to you.
First let's start with the oil based vs. the water based dye. I've had better luck with oil based or alcohol based dyes as far as penetration in the wood surface. water based dyes tend to react to the natural resins in the wood and in most cases don't give you the same bite. There are some great (there's one great oil based penetrating stain) left on the market. because of EPA's dealings with high VOC's, most of the chemicals that I studied with in school have been taken off the market. Alcohol dyes will also give you great penetration and bite.
As far as putting a finishing coat on, the rule is anything can go on top of shallac. But shallac cannot go on top of anything. By using BLO as a base coat, you will accelerate the deteriation of the bond between the shallac and the surface of the wood. BLO is no longer used in modern finishes because of it's rate of deterioration (turning black over time). BLO was used to maintain finishes in the past resulting in many antique finishes being destroyed. If it's color that your using BLO for, it would be better to tint the shallac in the early processes of finishing. In short, after you have your color selected, thin shallac to use as a base coat making sure that it soaks into the surface until dry to the touch. Lightly sand with 4/0 steel wool or fine grit finishing paper in between coats. Make sure that your stain, either alcohol or oil, is perfectly dry before the shallac base coat is started; it may take a couple of days to dry. If the stain isn't dry, the base coat would adhere. If the base coat doesn't adhere, neither will anything on top. From here continue adding coats of shallac (roughly 3 lbs. cut) correcting the color you wish to achieve as you go. I don't know if you can french polish but after the second or third color coat, french polishing can be started. In the old days they would brush on one or two coats, then french polish until high gloss and then if the finish was too shiny they would rub out using pumis or rotten stone mixed in an oil or water solution to achieve a satin look. By french polishing theres no need to fill the pores with filler. french polishing using a little bit of pumis will fill the pores as you finish. This finish is not as durable as most modern finshes but is correct to most period pieces that we work on and can be repaired remarkably easy. I'm sure I left some things out and could get into the process of deterioration resulting from the use of BLO if i didn't have to type for means of communication. If you need to hear more email me and i can talk to you on the phone much better.
-R. Bohn (conservator of wooden artifacts)            Thanks nick for typing for me.
Logged
Antiquity
Forum Master
***
Posts: 323


Professional period furniture maker


WWW
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2009, 07:35:31 AM »

There is one final test you can do.  Take a TM board and on one half stain it with an oil base stain and the other half water base stain.  Apply your top coats of finish.  In most cases the oil stain will produce a muddy, life-less look as compared to the water base.  I had a test board like this in our store to show customers and everyone was amazed at the dull oil stain finish.  In my opinion, oil stains are just thinned out paints.  If you are paying all that money for a TM board do you really want to apply an oil stain? 

Try the test and see for yourself.

Dennis Bork
Antiquity Period Designs, Ltd.
Logged

Professional period furniture maker since 1985.  Received a B.S. degree in physics then apprenticed and worked as a wood patternmaker for 12 years.  Hobies: wood working (of course) and driving my 930 turbo Porsche.
Rick Yochim
Forum Journeyman
**
Posts: 57


« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2009, 09:32:47 AM »

This thread continues to get more interesting and informative.

Rob,

Though I'm by no means an expert, I do think your filtered water misting will be fine. The whole point of not using tap water is to cut down on the probability, however slight, of chemicals in the water reacting with the tannins in the wood or the dye stain formuala and having the end result turn out splotchy, uneven or otherwise disappointing.  If the end result on your piece looks good, then it is good. PS. I have no experince with tung oil so I can't speak to it.

As for BLO, everyone is absolutely correct about it darkening the wood over time. I've seen it on some of my old - almost totally black - English molding planes where they were treated (doused, soaked, baptised etc) in linssed oil, in my own woodworking and, of course,  in the documeted reserach of experts.  But I still plan to apply it under the shellac becasue I WANT the darkening, blackish/amber effect over time.  That is why I'm not aging it now. I have settled on letting time get it to the hue I want.

And I plan to stick with a water based dye stain for exactly the reasons Dennis and orthers have stated. TM is a wood with a lot of drama and my piece is not an exact reproduction but an adaptation, so I'm consiously taking a little historical liberty by doing what I can to bring out (instead of hide) the figure in the wood. I think water based dye stain is the best way to do that.
 
Rick     
Logged
cbentzley
Forum Journeyman
**
Posts: 62


« Reply #24 on: March 11, 2009, 11:37:18 AM »

If I read Rob’s original post and question correctly, I think there is a bit of confusion and misinformation in some of the replies. First, I think Rob was referring to water soluble, alcohol soluble, and oil soluble powdered aniline dye stains. Oil soluble dyes are dissolved in mineral spirits, turpentine, paint thinner, and alkyd varnishes. Alcohol soluble dyes are dissolved in alcohols and shellac. Oil soluble dyes are as transparent as alcohol and water soluble dyes and should not be confused with pigmented oil stains. The downside of alcohol soluble and oil soluble powdered aniline dye stains is they are not light fast. Over 30 years ago, I purchased 7 basic colors of each variety, made up 2” x 3” samples from birch, mounted them on a large board, and hung it in my finishing room. With the exception of black, all of the alcohol and oil soluble dyes have faded dramatically, with the oil soluble dye being the worst, fading to the point that most of the samples look to be about the same color. Even the water soluble dyes have faded, but not as much. These samples are not exposed to sunlight, but fluorescent light. Because these dyes are so fugitive, I stopped using them.

About 10 years ago I started using TransTint liquid dye concentrate. These colors also fade with time but not as much as water soluble powdered aniline dyes. You can mix the TransTint liquid colors in a 50/50 mix of water and alcohol, which dries quickly and raises the grain less than straight water. That said, I usually mix Transtint liquid in water. I always raise the grain with distilled water before I stain. When the stain (dye) is dry, I knock off any subsequent raised grain with a gray or maroon Scotch Brite pad. Occasionally, I will tint boiled linseed oil with a darker TransTint color dissolved in MEK or acetone to achieve a more variegated look in curly maple. I’ve run into antique pieces where the striping has very pronounced dark stripes and the dark tinted oil helps to simulate this effect when I’m trying to match an existing piece. For my “standard” curly maple finish, I usually flood the dyed piece with Waterlox and wipe off the excess. When the Waterlox is dry, I go over the piece with a Scotch Brite pad, dust off and apply Behlen’s Van Dyke brown shading and glazing stain and wipe off the excess, allowing a bit to remain in crevices and low areas of carvings. When the glaze is dry, I apply 4 to 6 coats of 1-1/2 pound cut extra dark dewaxed shellac. I rub out with #0000 steel wool and apply a coat of Renaissance wax.

This finish schedule results in a rich, mellow, antique look that I like. In my opinion, many otherwise successful curly maple pieces have anemic finishes, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A final word of advice is to always take the time to make sample boards prepared in the same manner as the piece the finish is to be applied to. Record the steps and materials used. Even if you don’t like the final results, save the samples for future reference. It sure beats reinventing the wheel over and over again. I’ve also found it helpful to mask off half of a sample and let it sit in a sunny window for 6 months or so. When you remove the mask, the effects of UV light on the sample can be startling. It’s all part of the education process and knowledge is power.

Craig
Logged
Allan D. Brown
Forum Apprentice
*
Posts: 40


« Reply #25 on: March 11, 2009, 08:42:09 PM »

This is a great and informative thread...just wish someone could post some pictures to illustrate the various points!

Thanks to all for the information thus far. I look forward to hearing the results of some of the tests.
Logged
rococojo
Guest
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2009, 05:12:53 AM »

Allan, et ALL
  If we go to "Items for Sale" on this forum? a  good example can be found? ie
: Darkening of the wood? by using  BLO.
 Note: in the "For Sale" section? D Keller as for sale? One good Set of 8 Mathieson Cabinetmakers moulding planes,
 (notice the difference, on most plane? A light tan? to a chocolate color?
  Could be forword thinking? to  Pecure this good example for future teaching?
  only a  Suggestion?
                                 
                                                 Joseph Hemingway
                                                   Sharing the tricks of the trade
« Last Edit: March 12, 2009, 05:34:44 PM by rococojo » Logged
R Bohn
Forum Journeyman
**
Posts: 88


« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2009, 10:01:27 AM »

  Ok let me try this again. I have to agree with Denis, with the price of TM, I normally wouldn't use an oil based stain with the exception of one brand. I must have two dozen brands of oil based stain in my shop, of which all have there own special place to be used and all of which, when looking into the can, look like mud. Let me give you an example Masters, Old Masters and Original Masters all appear to be the same brand. Only Original Masters (S series S107, S109 etc.) gives you a mirror image of yourself when looking into the can

  As for water based stains, I live in an area in Minnesota that has a considerable amount of red iron making the use of water based anything somewhat exciting.
As I repair and maintain high end antique furniture across the country, water quality is not something you want to depend on

  On the other hand, a good reason to use alcohol based stain/dye is the shellac is also alcohol based. This gives you the ability to add, change or correct color as your building your finish. For example (and I know where discussing TM but) lets say we have a wide board of cherry that makes a table top perfectly except for that little bit sap wood on the edge. You have two choices you can cut the wood out or you can add a little bit of color to your shellac or french patch the sap wood out. French patching is a term most of you haven't heard before if you don't french polish. Now I know all of you have your favorite recipes for cherry and cherry isn't that easy to stain, but my point is that you now have control of the color throughout the entire finishing process, not just in the beginning

  Another Example, let say that your TM table top is stained to the perfect color (in your mind). But for that country piece, a high gloss is just too much. so you proceed to rub it out, and in the process you not only rub through the finish, but the color as well. Water based stain does not work on-top of finish but shellac tinted with a little alcohol dye or by french patching can correct the problem fairly easy.

  In the antique restoration/Conservation field, there are many rules and ethics that I must live by. However I also have a rule that if you built it, you make the rules. I also know that if you think the color your looking for is going to come out of one can, Well...

Have fun, take notes and pictures
R Bohn                                                                         

                                                                                                 Typed by Donovan
Logged
rchampagne
Forum Master
***
Posts: 115


« Reply #28 on: March 16, 2009, 02:19:42 PM »

Mr. Bohn,
Thank you for sharing your experience.  This site is such a great way to share knowledge.  Thanks to everyone for all the advice given in this post. 

I finished the piece the other day and am happy with the results.  I brushed the shellac on, then buffed it with 0000 steel wool between coats.  I applied three coats, then a coat of Goddard's wax.  The finish is smooth, has a satin sheen, and not much of a build up (I used a 1-1.5 lb cut).  The whole process was relatively easy, and the shellac was rather forgiving. 

I promised to post some pictures of the process, so here goes.  The lighting in my shop is not ideal, so some photos are with flash, others are not.  I think I'll onyl be able to get three photos attached (if it works).  The first two are of the piece ready for finish.  In the third photo, the piece has been dyed and allowed to dry.  I'll attached more photos in an additional post (assuming that these three worked!)
Rob
Logged
rchampagne
Forum Master
***
Posts: 115


« Reply #29 on: March 16, 2009, 02:22:43 PM »

Looks like it worked.  Here are a couple more photos.  The first is a view of the dyed top.  The second is a view of the carved fan, dyed and oiled.  In the third photo, the piece is finished with the brasses added. 
Thanks again for the help and advice. 
Rob
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Up Print 
The Society of American Period Furniture Makers  |  Tools and Techniques  |  Finishing  |  Topic: Oil Based v. Water Based Dye « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!