Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2013, 06:30:05 AM
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register Forum Archive
News: How do I register to use this Forum?

Instructional DVDs and plaster casts of the Philadelphia ball & claw, Newport shell, and acanthus knee carving are now available in the SAPFM Store

Join SAPFM Today!

The Society of American Period Furniture Makers  |  Tools and Techniques  |  Finishing  |  Topic: Hand Finishing vs Spray Finishing « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Hand Finishing vs Spray Finishing  (Read 4956 times)
jacon4
Forum Master
***
Posts: 216


collector/ student of early american furniture


« Reply #30 on: May 09, 2011, 06:55:39 AM »

An interesting article on 17/18th century finishes, it's 25 pages long so i have included a couple paragraphs on likely period finshes that cuts to the chase.

http://www.woodweb.com/knowledge_base_images/zp/use_of_wax_finishes.pdf




 American Finishing Techniques
Although oil polishing is not mentioned in the guide books until Roubo in 1774, it has long been
believed to have been one of the primary finishes used on Colonial American furniture. Linseed oil, the drying oil used in oil painting, was not available in large quantities and not often used in architectural painting prior to 1700.34 However, it was certainly available in quantities large enough to be used as a furniture finishing material. Oil and ground pigments were used to produce the decorative painting found on late seventeenth century furniture.35 Its use may have naturally extended to include transparent finished areas as well. This seems increasingly likely when one considers that few records have been found indicating that resins were being imported prior to 1700.
As early as 1640 Connecticut residents were directed to plant flax, the source of linseed oil36
and limited quantities of the oil were available late in the century.37 As the earliest records of linseed oil presses date from after the turn of the eighteenth century, it is likely that some of the early oil was being imported.38 Few cabinetmakers? account books from the first quarter of the eighteenth century have been found to verify its use by cabinetmakers; however, it was being sold by Boston japanner Nehemiah Partridge in 1713.39 Linseed oil appears frequently in the account books of cabinetmakers later in thecentury. A recipe for an oil varnish consisting of only linseed oil and pigment appears in the account books of cabinetmaker Isaac Byington.40
Logged
R Bohn
Forum Journeyman
**
Posts: 88


« Reply #31 on: May 09, 2011, 10:06:44 AM »

Hi All
   I think there are many pros and cons for hand and spray finishing, but the one that stands out is time. I don't have to say that making a living in this field can be a challenge [ high gas prices, shop expense, slow economy, etc]. I do spray from time to time but most is done by hand. A trained eye can easily pick-up the difference.
  As far as period finishes, I don't know any one that uses the old materials.  For the simple reason that modern materials hold up better. The Smithsonian has a board containing 75-80 different materials used in finishing, all appear different under black light.
   As for what to use?,  that can be a trick question.  If you are building furniture, as most of you are, you can use what ever works best. If you are building for trade, durability comes into the picture. And if you are restoring antiques, historic preservation in mind, you might use modern coating like B-67 or B-72. Is there one right answer?   I don't think so. There are combinations  that work better than others. One rule, Shellac goes under most finishes, not on top.And , of you that know me,BLO has a history, but too many draw-backs to use today.
  All of us want are creations to last. With that in mind, the choices narrow substantially. Repair ability  is the major factor. Someday that chair will need re- gluing  or that inlay will pop-up. If you use hide glue, simply re-glue. But if you a modern yellow or white glue the joint may be destroyed. The new glue will not stick to the old glue,the old residue will have to be removed. The same goes for finishes,If that water ring cant be repaired you have to strip the finish. Now the furniture you built to look one-way is going  to look the way the restorer thinks it should.
  So what are the finishes that can be repaired? Shellac can easily be repaired as can lacquer, some varnishes, not all. Then we get in to oils and wax, nether are durable and personally I don't think of them as a finish. Shellac has a history that goes back about 3000 yrs and has been detected on furniture in the 1500's{Wikipedia}. When you factor in the fact that a lot of furniture makers came from some place other than here, and that few finishers let there secretes out and didn' t right books I think the arrival/use of shellac in America should be looked at more closely.
  A word of caution, if you are not set up to spray [respirators, ventilation,etc,]use a different approach, and for sure not in the house.
   Be safe, do good work!
           Randy
  
« Last Edit: May 09, 2011, 10:15:16 AM by R Bohn » Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Up Print 
The Society of American Period Furniture Makers  |  Tools and Techniques  |  Finishing  |  Topic: Hand Finishing vs Spray Finishing « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!